As stated in my previous article: Why Diets Fail - The Salt/Water/Waste Issue, Diet-related weight loss has two distinct stages: first, the loss of phantom weight, and second the actual loss of excess body fat.

The loss of phantom weight lasts for about two weeks. It consists primarily of a reduction of undigested foods, fluids, and stools inside the gastrointestinal tract, but almost no actual body fat.

The first stage: phantom weight loss, can be anywhere from 5 to 20 lbs., depending on one’s starting weight, diet, and colon health. However, after the first stage, even though one is still consuming the exact same diet, the quick scale drop ends and the “magic” is over.

The second stage: permanent loss of body fat, is where we get what we are ACTUALLY going for. How long that stage takes depends on many factors, beginning with the amount of fat one needs to lose and ending with one’s age, height, gender, ethnicity, occupation, rate of metabolism, personality type, the quality of sleep, physical activity, diet composition, and climate, together with some additional factors.

There is a way to estimate the time it will take to lose excess fat weight instead of using the common “3500 calories equals 1 fat lb Theory”.

 We can estimate how long we can expect an effective weight loss diet to take, by using the following formula:

1. Excess fat = Current weight minus Desired weight minus Phantom weight
   
   
2. Fat loss duration equals Excess fat divided by Daily fat loss
   
   
3. Total diet duration equals Fat loss duration plus Two weeks

• Current weight. Weigh on a reasonably accurate scale the first thing in the morning, in the nude, after urinating, before eating or drinking anything.

• Desired weight is the target “normal” weight.

• Phantom weight loss is determined during the first two weeks of one’s diet. This weight is incredibly self-deceptive, because no matter how big as this number might be, for all intents and purposes it is nearly meaningless to true weight (i.e., fat) loss.

• Excess fat is the only realistic measure of one’s weight “problem.” That is the number one wants to lose, and losing it requires quite some time. One’s excess fat is determined by subtracting one’s phantom weight losses and one’s desired weight from one’s current weight.

• Fat loss duration is the number of days one must remain on a lower calorie diet until attaining one’s desired weight. People who start a weight-loss diet with unrealistic expectations will probably stop consistently following it, long before that diet has a chance to prove itself, one way or another.

• Average Daily fat loss. To establish this number as accurately as is possible, one will need to stay on a fat reduction diet for at least 14 to 28 days (two to four weeks or longer) after completing the first two week phantom weight loss period.

        This is because of:

(a) the low resolution of consumer weight scales;

(b) day-to-day natural weight loss fluctuations;

(c) the propensity of weight loss to slow down somewhat as the body adjusts to reduced calorie intake; and

(d) inevitable lapses in one’s daily caloric intake.

To properly estimate daily fat loss, wait until the weight number taken AFTER the first two weeks, drops at least 5 more lbs, and divide this number by the number of days it took to lose there. .

...... If one doesn’t see any measurable weight reduction for this period, it means that the diet being used, is too generous for that person’s particular rate of metabolism, and that person will need to reduce caloric intake even more......  Whatever the diet or food plan, as long as a person consumes less nutrients than their body expends for energy and structural metabolism, fat loss … over time …. is just as certain to occur as sunrise and sundown.

• Total diet duration. It’s important to realize that the total diet duration will probably be longer than one’s most conservative estimate, because Real Life continues to happen, diet or no diet.

Here is an Example which uses the above-stated formula:

1. 200 lb Current weight … subtract 150 lb Desired weight (50 lbs)…subtract 7 lb Phantom weight… equals Excess Fat of 43 lbs.
   

2. Excess Fat (43 lb) divided by Daily fat loss (.14 – see Hypo below) equals Fat Loss Duration of 307 days.
   
   Hypothetical example of daily fat loss - 4 lb total net weight-loss during the four-weeks AFTER the first two week (phantom weight-loss) period. Divide 4 lbs by 28 days (4 weeks) results equal approx .14 of one lb per day.
   
   

   Fat loss duration (307 days) plus two weeks Total weight-loss diet duration 321 days
   
   Pursuant to this formula, starting the diet on January 1st, at 200 lbs, and correctly and consistently following that diet for 321 days (45 weeks), one could expect to reach 150 lbs by the end of November:

Below is a comparison of the use of the above-stated formula to the standard THEORY used,..." A 3500 Calorie Deficit equals a one fat lb loss" :

45 weeks losing 43 fat lbs equals weight-loss of approximately 1 lb per week.
would indicate that one’s actual dietary - (caloric) - deficit for that entire period of time would have been approximately 500 calories a day.

 It is very important to REMEMBER however, that even the “right-for-you” weight-loss or maintenance diet fails unless it truly is consistently and patiently followed correctly.

Sometimes I just don't feel like doing
the things that need to be done.

Today I watched a technical, but interesting, video of a University lecture given on March 26, 2013 by Stephen C. Woods about Peptides, Food Intake and Body Weight: Problems of Interpretation.

Peptides are organic substances of which the molecules are structurally like those of proteins, but smaller. Peptide Hormones include insulin, leptin, ghrelin, glucagon, growth hormone, obestatin as well as many, many others.

For many years Dr. Woods has been involved in obesity scientific research, primarily re insulin.

He said that a key question is whether the Responses that counter drug/food effects are actually Unconditional, invariant and whether or not traditional concepts of Homeostatsis are viable.

In considering this question, note the following:

Homeostaisis --- Unconditioned stimulas equals Unconditioned Response.

There are ...

Homeostatic Controls - Hypothalamus (part of the brain primarily involved with involuntary stimulas and response of Peptides)

and....

Non-Homeostatic Controls – Amugdala, Accumbens, etc ( parts of the brain involving Anxiety, social situations, learning, hedonics, etc.)

The process of Homostaisis can be disturbed by Non-Homeostatic Controls.

Food intake involves BOTH types of Controls at the same time. Food intake is a Behavior which involves BOTH (unconditioned) physiological and (conditioned) psychological factors: An Example of a Conditioned stimulas and Conditioned response is Pavlov’s dog.

Based on his many years of involvement with scientific research re Peptides, Dr. Woods states the following Conclusions:

Conclusion 1:
Different labs get different results when administering Peptides and assessing food inake.

Conclusion 2: 
Peptides alter food intake in some situations and not others.

Conclusion 3:
The ability of a Peptide to alter food intake varies within the same lab.

Conclusion 4:
Subtle, or not so subtle, environmental factors can determine whether a Peptide influences food intake, and can even reverse the direction of the response.

To watch the lecture click the following link: Peptides, Food Intake and Body Weight: Problems of Interpretation.

 Perfection Is The Lowest Standard We Can Set For Ourselves

Perfection doesn't exist.  When we expect it, we immediately set ourselves up for failure because the unattainable standard we've set in our minds can never be reached. Therefore, we've unknowingly set the lowest expectation for ourselves by mistakenly setting the highest.

It’s rather arrogant to set an impossible standard for ourselves and not for others. But we tend to be kind, supportive and understanding of our friends, seeing them through their tough times and setbacks, while beating ourselves up relentlessly for any misstep of our own.

It’s unreasonable to expect perfection and success from ourselves while holding others to a separate standard.

Lets not place expectations on anyone, not ourselves, our friends, our opponents, our family or even strangers. The truth is that no one can predict or rehearse life. Life has a beautiful unpredictability to it.

Some of the contents of the above post originated from an article by Danielle Robinson, March 29, 2013 - mindbodygreen.com,